Please Vote, here is my reason for chosing Activision over Electronic arts, please share your own view!
For many years gamers their hate has gone towards Electronic Arts. At some point I do believe I shared these feelings myself, they have ruind good studio's (bullfrog, westwood, maxis to name a few) and they have ripped people off with bad- DLC and yearly sport franchises with just name changes (like Fifa on Wii or Psvita).
However, Activision, once a great company has also made a lot of missteps. Obviously they are behind the milk-train that is Call of Duty, but arguably Electronic Arts is doing something simulair with Battlefield, however, Activision has been releasing a streak of horrible games and have ignored fans in their requests of what they would like next, something EA (in my opinion) has gotten a bit better at.
Recently the 0.8 user scored Ghostbusters might be the biggest indication of this shifting point, also, the Turtles game is on almost the same "horrible" game rating. Call of Duty has been getting hate for ignoring fan requests and they are bundling exclusive remakes of their beloved game behind a "only if you buy the most expensive version" paywall. With games like Tony Hawk and many many remasters, Activision is on a huge decline I believe.
Obviously EA is not "home free" but they have released a mirrors edge, unraveled, started listening to people on what they would like from a new battlefield and generally seem to be on a rise after reaching rock bottum some years ago.
What do you think?
Twitter @CyberMalistix
