kyprime said:
mountaindewslave said:
kyprime said:
Most people that are playing Pokemon Go are NOT pokemon fans, it's just a mobile game that is social, that it, it will be dead in a month, is Nintendo capable of creating a service like PS+ and make more money just with that than the whole of Sony? like they are doing more money with PS+ than the whole of Nintendo? |
right, if all of the people playing Pokemon GO are casuals then explain why the Pokemon games are some of the best selling every gen and almost always seem to hit 10 million (even both versions of very similar games)?
Sony isn't doing more with PS+ than the whole of Nintendo, and you should watch your words before you further jinx Sony, their video game division is doing better but the company isn't out of debt and their other company sections haven't magically started to do amazingly
|
facts son http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2016-04-28-sonys-psn-is-making-more-money-than-all-of-nintendo
|
The number they used is for Network Services. Network Services is not just PS+, so this is somewhat misleading. Network Services is also not just for PSN games either. Network Services is an all encompassing division (that is grouped with the game division) that along with games includes all services for video, music, photo streaming like those that were under Sony Entertainment Network (SEN), PS Vue, Spotify and other networked services. So no, PS+ is not making more money than the whole of Nintendo.
