JWeinCom said:
That's the way I write. If I'm doing something you think warrants moderation, feel free to click the button. I will call awful arguments awful if they are. I will say an argument fails if it does. When you're claiming that a game was inspired by a game that came out around the same time, and was announced after it was well into development, then that is an awful argument that fails. You're adding more stuff to it now (btw I never said I'd played any of the eye toy games), but I responded to the argument you gave me, which was undeniably ridiculous, failing, stupid, awful etc. You're free to call my arguments stupid if you could show that they are. Judging by the fact you didn't, I'm going to assume they stand. I said the move was a rip off of the Wii, and Sports Champions was a rip off, and that Everybody Dance was a rip-off. There are other Move games that weren't. As for there being a possibility that Nintendo was inspired by the Eye Toy, no. there is absolutely none. |
Underlined: I like how you still call my arguments ridiculous, failing, stupid and awful. Funnily it seems to be when you don't know how to respond. You completely ignored the fact that the Eyetoy Play series included boxing, table tennis, bowling, volleyball, etc. How convenient ;)
Bolded: See, my problem is your black and white argument where one company is ripping off and another isn't even in the least bit inspired. Imo both of these examples below are products of a company being inspired but according to you:
Inspired? Yes, "blatant rip off".


Inspired? No, "not in the least bit".


_(En,Fr,De,Es,It,Nl,Pt,Sv,No,Da,Fi,El)-3.jpg)

This is indeed a waste. I'm done.







