Greenpace attacks consoles!

[LetsAllMakeBelieve]

@ Sqrl - You wanted a post by post critique.

Post 1 - Yes this has happend before, but the nature of climate change at the moment is unprecedented (if it isnt please let me know, as that would actually impress me) also recent climate change has been coinciding with human adoption of polluting technology and industry, this has had a direct impact on our planets climate. Yes it probably has been exagerated, but i dont think that this is enough to say its not happening at all.
Post 2 - Your point here is essentially that graphs can be manipulated to support either side, we all knew that already, still it proves nothing.
Post 3 - This is a poor argument, politics will allways play a part in any debate like this.
Post 4 - Natural temprature variance does happen i agree, but ive not heard of it happening inline with human causes pre-industrial revolution. as ive already said graphs can be manipulated.
Post 5 - if you want to talk numbers, you will allways lose this argumeent, infact this post is actually against other posts you made saying numbers were irrelevent.
Post 6 - If the truth is truly your goal, then why do you refuse to give any actuall hard evidence to support your argument, could be such evidence does not exist?
Post 7 - Scientists change their mind, again this could be said of your viewpoint as well, im am currently researching this myself and if i can find some specifics i will gladly post them for you.
Post 8 - Here you openly mock another user and cite only your prior posts as evidence.
Post 9 - Fair enough you responded to another users comment.
Post 10 - As ive already pointed out this article proves nothing.
Post 11 - Again you insult another users intelligence, i unlike PS360 am well aware of the differences between GW and AGW.
Post 12 - Fair comment.
Post 13 - Fair comment.
Post 14 -" You are free to believe whatever you like, I have no desire to convince every man woman and child, only those who are interested to learn the facts as I am. I again apologize if I came across as condescending, I shouldn't have allowed my frustration with you to influence my responses."

This implies that people who disagree with you are uneducated, which is both inflamitory and untrue.
Post 15 - Post 14 clearly implies you do think you are more intelligent than PS360.
Post 16 - Fair Comment.
Post 17 - Again i refer you to your 14th post.
Post 18 - Fair Comment.
Post 19 - Yes PS360 was childish, but you are not an entirely innocent party here, Post 14 agian.
Post 20 - Yes you have a better argument than PS360, but to win you need to disprove AGW.
Post 21 - You later threaten to leave the debate becaues i praised on topic posts, this proves you are a hippocrit.
Post 22 - Good, im glad you understand that, but why then did you continue to orely on that graph to debunk PS360?
Post 23 - Again as i said graphs can be manipulated by either side.
Post 24 - Ive already adressed this thread earlier in the debate.
Post 25 - NYT v Wikipedia, neither is perfect, i will concede that wikipedia is flawed, but as i said in a prior post, it has lots of reliable links.
Post 26 - I am doing that here
Post 27 - I am doing that here, threating to leave a debate does not make you a defacto winner.
Post 28 - What Personal attacks, What flamebait?

I am trying to be civil and open here, plaese read my points and debate properly, no more insults. I apologise if i have offended you, however you are not innocent here.