By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheBlackNaruto said:
thismeintiel said:

My first point remains.  The halftruth, which is also a lie.  You go around talking about a kid playing with a gun, without giving the whole picture.  I pretty much forced you to write the whole details.  But, in your normal, everyday life, when you talk about it, do you give the details?  Highly doubt it.  It remains a kid playing with a toy and getting shot.  One that looked real unless you were right next to it.  One that had the tip removed because the kid wanted it to look more real.  He got his wish.

And why would the cops have to come out and say they felt miserable?  Not like BLM would have believed them.  Probably would have made them even angrier.  It has more to do with the kid's actions as to why he was shot, not that he was holding a gun.  If he wasn't standing in the same area with the purpose of threatening to "shoot" people that were walking by.  If he had just dropped the weapon, instead of walking with it in both hands towards the cops.  And sorry, that is not playing.  He was being a bully, backing it up with a gun.  He was not frolicking around or hiding in bushes, just trying to scare people or play cowboys.  He was bullying them.  Waiting around the same spot for more people to come by, so he could pull his gun out on them.  And if that is play to him, or you, there is something wrong.

And yes, I can say that that is the case with a straight face.  Since THIS didn't become a HUGE national story that we are still feeling the affects of.  Reason it wasn't?  Doesn't fit the narrative or help push it.  Now, imagine if that was a 6 yr old black kid and two white cops.  Yea, you know damn well we'd still be reeling from that.

Where is the half truth lol. Because I didn't say it looked like a real gun it makes it a half truth? How explain that to me? Whenever this discussion is brought up ALL the facts are always talked about which is this child was playing in the park by himself with a toy gun that looked real. Going up to random people acting like he shot them. Those are the facts....guess what else is a fact he died because of a trigger happy cop. Not because he was as you said "acting like a thug"  as you put it. I have to ask do you have kids? Because 99% of kids play around like they are shooting stuff and people all the time. The child may not have fully understood the situation with the cops and kept playing in his mind. So that means death? No my friend thatis not acceptable.

Well if you shot a child who you thought had a gun would you not come out and say you felt miserable? Isn't that the human thing to do if that is how you feel? And it is funny how you assume the BLM movement would not have believed them...part of the outrage was because of the lack of remorse from what happened.

Did you read that story? This man allegedly(not sure if that part is true) tried to hit the officers with his car and they opened fire and were even assumed to have a grudge against the man. Those officers were ARRESTED AND CHARGED with murder....did any of that with Tamir Rice or the most recent two shootings? Did the chilld shoot at the officers with the toy gun and justify the killing? Were they arrested and charged with murder? It is funny how you say people only see half truths but pulled up a video that goes against what you were saying because it showed the opposite of what has been happening when blacks are killed by white cops. They get off with a slap on the wrist and get to go home to their families. These officers were charged and arrested. You can't see the difference here? That's the argument that has been being made.

The half truth is how you approach the story.  You really just want it to be about a black kid playing in the park with a toy gun that was shot by a trigger happy cop.  You actually watch the vid you get the whole picture.  The kid was bullying people, not playing, with an airsoft pistol that looked exactly like a real gun.  And unless you have some sick perversion for the word play or you are just using that word to continue to push your narrative, he was not playing.  He was threatening to shoot them with what they thought was a real gun.  The police are called.  The second the kid sees the cops coming, he starts walking towards them, pulling the gun out of his pocket to point at them.  The cops open fire, fearing it was real.  No trigger happy about it.  If it had been a real gun he could have killed one of them or both.  The fact we know it wasn't real AFTER THE FACT, changes nothing.  The kid acted stupidly and got shot for it.  The cops acted how they would if that kid was yellow, white, brown, or was an adult.  You don't point a gun at a cop and expect him to do nothing, just it MIGHT not be real.  Personal responsibility.

And yes, they were charged, something that happens to a lot white cops, too.  My point was that something like that could happen to a white kid and the nation wouldn't bat an eye.  That proves my point.  The problem your side seems to have is that you only see things through the prism of hindsight and therefore people should go to jail.  The law doesn't work that way and thank God it doesn't.  A grand jury's job is to actually look at evidence and the definition of what the defendant is charged with and determine if there is enough to charge them on.  If not, it's dropped.  If so, it goes to court.  They don't judge him on mob rule.  Or the feels.  Or hindsight.  And the two recent stories just happened.  Have they even reached a decision, yet?