By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aielyn said:
DonFerrari said:

The original quote is basically saying more in the light of "she should receive sanctions and they decided not to" than "this kind of thing could or could not end in sanction"

So your interpretation is moving from the guilty to not guilty

Erm... did you even READ the quote? "But that is not what we are deciding now". That's literally what they said. They said that someone who did what Clinton and her team did might be subject to administrative or security sanctions, but that's not what the FBI was judging.

Notice that the next step was the State Department reopening their investigation? Because administrative and security sanctions are the jurisdiction of the State Department, not the FBI.

This is literally exactly how this should have gone - she didn't break laws, so the FBI don't recommend the DoJ press charges, but her actions were certainly questionable, so the State Department is going to take the information the FBI gathered.

But hey, you've decided she's guilty of some vague, undefined crime, therefore me pointing out what they literally said must be me "interpreting" it "from guilty to not guilty", right?

Then it may be my english interpretation on the "But that is not what we are deciding now". I interpreted that they decided not to go through and you interpreted as "we are not deciding a judicial situation"



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."