By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
Aielyn said:

I'd respond meaningfully to your statement, but I'm not even clear on what you're trying to say. Are you suggesting that my direct interpretation of the FBI comments, which clearly state that those who do what Clinton did might be subject to sanctions, but that the FBI weren't tasked with determining sanctions, was "mental gymnastics"? And what "spectrum" are you referring to?

I'm seriously at a loss to understand what you're trying to say.

The original quote is basically saying more in the light of "she should receive sanctions and they decided not to" than "this kind of thing could or could not end in sanction"

So your interpretation is moving from the guilty to not guilty

Guilty in this case would mean she would be fired from being SoS, no longer being able to access matters of top security.  But guess what, she is no longer SoS and does not have access to matters of top security.  You can't be fired from a job you no longer have.



A warrior keeps death on the mind from the moment of their first breath to the moment of their last.