Mr Puggsly said:
Aura7541 said:
Again, how do you know? You're making rather definitive statements without providing much elaboration. I warned you about Proof from Assertion and already, you're making this fatal mistake. You also overlooked some of my previous points, most notably whether Square Enix willing to take such lengths to increase the fanbase. Will it actually pay off on the long run or is SE better just putting in minimum effort and hope consumers will buy ROTR whenever they can? Whether SE got a lot of money from MS doesn't really matter if fanbase growth is significantly shackled because the latter is more important in the long term. And if it takes great lengths to grow that fanbase, then the money SE received from MS is pretty much moot.
You're also being vague when you throw the term "millions" around. How many millions? What is your source for that specific number and I hope you're not getting it from Chartz.
|
Steamspy, VGChartz, and assumption the game is doing okay digital on X1. MS said it sold well over million a while back.
How about you prove it didn't sell millions! See how I turned it around? How you like them apples?
|
You need to be more specific. I asked you how many millions. All you provided was a milestone that was met at the end of last year, but what is the number now and how do you know? Why do you think VGChartz is an appropriate source when NPD threads have shown that it does not track software accurately? What makes you assume that the game is doing okay digitally? Actually, why are you making assumptions in the first place?
The bolded is also a strawman fallacy as well as shifting the burden of proof to the skeptic. The burden of proof lies on the person making the positive claim and so far, you have not fulfilled that criteria.
