Machiavellian said:
On the PS3, I purchase the system because it had the games I wanted. I care not if Sony took a loss on the system or made a profit. If the price was outside of my range or I felt it was overprice I would not purchase the system. Just like any consumer I evaluate my purchase based on preceived value. If I do not see the value I do not make the purchase. The same thing for PS+. Online Peer to Peer MP does not need a service. If there is a service there needs to be value added features. If Sony only reason to add MP to PS+ is for Profit then they need to do better. Just accepting what a company does and not push them to do more will always lead the company to complacentcy. |
Way to move the goalpost right?
But ok since we won't have anything fruitfull of this conversation I'll just say 21M users saw the value, you don't, ok.
Mummelmann said:
We've been terrible at tracking the PS4 this year, Q1 was a full-fledged disaster. |
Still not at the level you said a post ago.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







