Wright on 03 July 2016
| GribbleGrunger said: Because, if Sony went the same route as MS, I'd be paying to maintain the servers for people who were getting it for free. If it was just a PC version like SF5 I wouldn't be paying for their servers and I'd know that all the money I was paying was actually going to improve PSN. |
You don't pay to maintain someone's server. You pay in order to being able to play online; whatever transpires with that money once you've given it to the company that puts the paywall in the first place is up to said company. Likewise, the money spent in order to play online doesn't really go to improve the service. It goes to the company's pockets.
