By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kerotan on 03 July 2016
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
Kerotan said:

No most here agree with me.  

And another contradiction is saying SFV sold so little on ps4/pc because it's mediocre but it would have sold "millions" on X1. Like do x1 owners not get put off by mediocre games?  Lol of course they do.  And please do drop the tangent.  There was no need to bring it up in the first place.  

An ip is damaged if it's sales potential is damaged.  All those non ps4 sales won't just simply return.  It's not like ROTTR is an uncharted 4 quality game of the gen.  It's not that simple my friend. 

I dont think they do, you also struggle to understand my points.

I didnt say it was going to sell millions on X1, but millions may have played it on X1. I choose my words carefully and you still misinterpret pretty much all the time. But you wont admit that.

It could be argued that SFIII hurt the IP. But the success of SFIV tells me it didnt. SFV hurt trust in Capcom and SF is getting stale.

Even if RotTR doesent achieve full potential of sales, the IP can be fine. I dont know how to make argument more simple than that. Maybe there is nothing left to say?

So let me get this right.  I say sales on xbox would be low,  because #1 ps4 gets sells multiple times the x1 version of most multiplats #2 the series is Playstation biased #3 because the game was mediocre.  

 

And you reply with "millions of Xbox players may have played it".  Low just trying to dodge my point big time lol.  

 

On ROTTR.  Of course the ip can be fine.  I never said it's forever damaged.  But for now it is and they will have to work hard to get it back up. It's clear as day what I'm saying.