By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kerotan on 03 July 2016
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
Kerotan said:

 

Lol read the thread before jumping into the middle of a debate.  

He was pretending that the ip wasn't damaged earlier (probably just for the sake of disagreeing with me)  and moved the goalposts by bringing SFV into it.  

He's since agreed that the ip is damaged by the exclusivity move but he's trying to continue the argument on a tangent (SFV). 

He's gone around in circles.  I've stayed consistent.  

Well he's got it right in my opinion.

I don't think IP is damaged, just the potential sales of RotTR. I said that a few times in this thread, that's why a money hat costs money. Tomb Raider's fanbase has grown and shrank in the past.

I think SFV is damaged by being mediocre and losing out to the Xbox userbase entirely. Now lets drop SFV, agreed its a tangent.

I'm not going in circles, you just aren't understanding my points regardless how many times I repeat them. Other users seems to get what I'm saying though.

No most here agree with me.  

 

And another contradiction is saying SFV sold so little on ps4/pc because it's mediocre but it would have sold "millions" on X1. Like do x1 owners not get put off by mediocre games?  Lol of course they do.  And please do drop the tangent.  There was no need to bring it up in the first place.  

 

An ip is damaged if it's sales potential is damaged.  All those non ps4 sales won't just simply return.  It's not like ROTTR is an uncharted 4 quality game of the gen.  It's not that simple my friend.