Mr Puggsly said:
The cost of a Bluray drive isnt the same as an expensive Bluray player. Those expensive players were being sold at a large profit for early adopters. I believe PS3 was primarily bleeding on the cost of the Cell. I mean they were being used as cheap super computers. In regard to pricing, I think MS is willing to be more competitive than Sony. I didnt claim they were willing to lose hundreds on every console sold |
If they are willing to be MORE competitive than Sony, and Sony blead hundreds in each console how would MS be more competitive without bleading at least the same?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







