Playstation: 21 Million PS+ Subscribers

[DonFerrari]

Machiavellian said:

DonFerrari said:

Why not congratulate them on taking a decision that made the business profitable and sustainable (a thing it wasn't in the past) and just so you know there isn't nothing free in the world, someone will always be paying for it. Before it was Sony and now it's their costumers (and seeing like they have 1/2 their userbase paying for it it seems like the customers are happy enough to be charged for their online).

I disagree with the charge and wouldn't pay for PS+ for online, but I also disagree with MP online and would like more local MP games. But the market wants to go to another direction.

As a consumer, I really do not care about Sony being profitable at my expense.  I guess I see it differently.  If Sony provided some really must have features to online MP since they are not really losing anything if its peer to peer thats one thing.  I am not sure customers are happy to be charged for MP play, its that they have no say in the matter if they want to play MP.  Whether you are on Sony or MS network you have to pay, only Nintendo is free.

most games are on pc with free multiplayer, so they have that choice (on Nintendo you won't have those games) so they have a choice, and funny thing, they choosen PS4 or X1.

Do you buy any Nintendo product? Because their profit margin is quite high so that would be a company being profitable at your expense, look at how much a MS or Sony game cost to produce and how many they sell compared to Nintendo and see which company is getting your money and which is giving you back. On PS3 have you felt bad that Sony was taking a loss so you could have a cheaper vg and so sent them a check of 200,00 usd for that loss when you bought your console?