By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nem said:
Mike_L said:

Well, I subscribed to PS+ far before PS4 was released due to the free games on PS3.

These are just some of the titles you got on PS3:
-snip-

etc.

 

Nowadays, you get 6 games a month for $4. Still pretty good value to me (or else I wouldn't subscribe).

If Nintendo ever launched a similar service (free games + online play) wouldn't you be interested?

If you are getting for the games, fair enough. Not that they don't have great sales anyways, so even if you didn't sub you would be able to get them by as cheap or cheaper.

But that in no way justifies hiding the acess to online gaming to dupe people into paying for something they hardly use under the guise that you "might" get some good free games. PS4 has shown you mostly indie games.

And no i would not. And i find it sad that you are trying to right me off as a Nintendo fan. I have more Sony systems than Nintendo and microsoft system you know? Doesn't make me a Sony fan either. I will point out the smelly stuff anywhere i see it.

And I find it sad that you're painting me as someone who is easily duped. I wouldn't subscribe if it wasn't worth it for me. I doubt so many others would. The people that've bought 24.7 amiibo aren't duped either as long as it's worth it to them.

Rather PS+ or amiibo than microtransactions in Kim Kardashian's latest phone game. But again, if they find value in a virtual lipgloss and virtual hair extensions, I won't waste my life standing in their way.

 

I don't know from which manufacturer you have the most consoles. I just thought you'd be interested in potential Nintendo products (and services) based on the far majority of the latest posts in your history.

It was a genuine question. Not trying to "right you off as a Nintendo fan". Now I know you'd never support a paid Nintendo service offering free games and online play. That's fair, man. I'm not saying everyone has to love PS+ and XBL Gold.