By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 29 June 2016
Edit Thread
torok said:
DonFerrari said:

Because FF I, II, III, etc aren't sequels to the other games... only FF X-2, XIII-2 and Lightning returns are sequels hence the double numbering

Yes, yes, I understood their logic. Anyway, I think it's kinda dumb to name a game 13-2. And well, Lightning Returns instead of XIII-3 is at least confusing.

Yep dumb, but what can we do

Zkuq said:
DonFerrari said:

Final Fantasy because it was the last game they had money to make and if it didn't made the success it had then they would close doors. Then it became a franchise.

I know, but the name has nothing to do with the contents of the games, it's only reflective of the development process and not the games themselves.

I agree, but the name is kinda fitting since they are always saving earth from one last fantasy



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."