| torok said: Final Fantasy X and X-2, XIII and XIII-2 and of course, "Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII", that would be FF XIII-3. Really, why not just move to 11, 14 and so? Why to make sequels of a sequel? It's like a sub-chapter? WTF? And the last one is the best name ever. Also, Simon's Quest. It's plain dumb. And Street Fighter 2010. It's just a sidescroller with a guy that IMPLIED to be Ken. Sleeping Dogs. Watch Dogs. The Need for Speed sequels with repeated names, like Most Wanted, the new NFS and Hot Pursuit. Far Cry. Devil May Cry. Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance. It's kinda stupid but also kinda awesome. It's the most awesome dumb name ever or maybe the dumbest awesome name. |
Because FF I, II, III, etc aren't sequels to the other games... only FF X-2, XIII-2 and Lightning returns are sequels hence the double numbering
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
