By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Peh said:
Player2 said:

There's no need for that. Same chemical reactions could lead to different results because in physics 2+2 isn't always 4. or 5. or 6.

Quick example:

Take a male bunny and a female bunny and put them in a rabbity hole for four months. Do you know how many bunnies are there in the hole now?

That's a flawed argument. You went from physics to mathematics to biology. I suppose you don't even know where you are going with it.

But your bunny issue can be explained easily by biology. I don't want to even debunk this, because it's a waste of time.

If this is all you have to say I must have done something right.