| Teeqoz said: Ironic because you acknowledge that there is no free will and thus even the mass murderers and terrorists didn't choose to commit the qctions they did. If it's not as a deterrent, then what is it for? Punishing them for making a decision that you already agree that humans are incapable of making? It makes no sense when you acknowledge that free will doesn't exist. |
It's not ironic ... 
They may have not chosen to commit these crimes but that doesn't mean society doesn't want to rid of nonconformant behaviour ...
Just because they failed to adopt a conformant behaviour mean that we should spare them ...
Just because humans are incapable of decision doesn't mean that their incapable of learning like rol giving that 2 + 2 example in the other thread ... 
