By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
IllegalPaladin said:
sieanr said:
Blue3 said:
leo-j said:
Here's the thing if kotaku guy wateverhis name is goes to the ps place and would compare halo 3 to the new killzone what do you think he would say?

hard to say, kotaku are retards.

...


Yeah, its such an easy comparison that even kotakutrads should get it. Prerendered CG vs a real game

Has everyone forgotten Killzone 1? Sony tried to hype it just as much.

How about one of the first Halo 2 teasers? The one I'm thinking of is when the Master Chief is walking to the airlocked doors while radio chatter is played in the background. While this is going on, it constantly cuts to his 'mission objectives' and then jumps into space? (The actual version of that is when he takes that bomb and carries it off the ship in the first(?) level).

 


The difference in those was that people actually liked Halo (also guessing that they didn't also blatently lie). I don't really like all pre-rendered trailers since I'm more intereted in what actually matters in a game: gameplay.

As for Killzone 2, I'll still never get why people are getting so excited over this game. The first really wasn't that great and the only thing people have to go on is an old pre-rendered trailer. Other than that, from what I've read the game doesn't offer any new type of gameplay or action, just your generic FPS. Not saying a generic FPS is a bad thing and can't be fun, it could be a great FPS, I just don't understand why people see this game as the second coming.

-edit-

And please don't take this a OMG I HATE TEH BS3!!! IT R DOOMED statement, take it as a why do people care so much about Killzone 2 statement.