Alby_da_Wolf on 23 June 2016
| poklane said: Looks like the misleading picture has the XB1s 40% smaller in each dimension (length, width and height) |
| shikamaru317 said: The problem seems to be that they're showing it as 40% smaller in each dimension (length, width, and height), when it's actually 40% smaller by volume. Microsoft actually announced that it's 40% smaller by volume, maybe the marketing team didn't get that memo |
Yes, 40% smaller volume means, if they shrank it uniformly, little less than 16% smaller along each axis.
Maybe for a PR CV creative maths is valued more than real maths. 
