| Intrinsic said: Thats what i am wondering too. My guess is that there shold be a tangible difference. We can see a differemce between native 1080p and 900p upscaled to 1080p. And the difference between 900p and 1080p is just around a 50% bump in pixels. The difference between 1080p and 4k is around a 4 times bump in pixel count. But sony probably has test units testing just this, do they feel that with whatever upscaling tech they are using it will be a enough to make it just as good or passable? Cause unless they see no value in putting native 4k level hardware into a box then i see no reason why they will be set on doing what they are seemingly doimg now. Hopefully someone with more tech knowledge can shed some light on this. |
It'll be notable, but the extent of which will really be dependant on TV size and distance. We have to remember that most 4k Tvs are only 55", the reality is native 4k versus 1080p is only going to be a big leap when sitting within around 7feet of that size TV set. 1080p is the point of diminishing returns going beyond that, not to say high resolutions won't visible but less obvious than 720p versus 1080p. I don't think Sony are too worried.
Also If Scorpio strives for native 4k, what room would it have for actual graphical improvements? Neo would easily have the better looking games in such a situation.
