By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 said:
SuaveSocialist said:

Picture a Flat-Earther saying that to an astronaut.  If you can do that much you may understand why I, like the astronaut, am unmoved by such a statement.  There was nothing to argue---the data is clear. 

False equivalency. The shape of the earth is based on various inputs of collaborating data, most of which is accumulated through rigourous induction.

Like the aforementioned figures.  So it's not false equivalency at all, actually.  But go right on ahead. If it gives you psychological validation, feel free to deny reality and try to replace it with your own.

Bye!