| sabastian said: If Horizon Zero Dawn was announced with Zelda graphics and gameplay, vs Zelda being announced with Horizon Zero Dawn gameplay and graphics, almost unanimously 100% of you would agree that Zelda was the better game. Anyone with a clear head would see that Horizon Zero Dawn is the better game by a mile. Zelda look bland, slow and extremely outdated. Zelda 5/10 Horizon Zero Dawn 9/10 |
funny you talking for other people.
graphics aren't everything for one, and for another- the graphics styles are INCREDIBLY different. its not an apples to apples comparison- you can't just compare a game going for a more realistic aesthetic to a game LITERALLY going for a Japanese cartoon look (cel shading and the art in general).
at any rate though I would argue that Ocarina of TIme as a 'wow' game still is better than a lot of adventure titles that come out TODAY so I would argue your opinion is pretty flawed.
the 'wow' factor involves more than just 'oh my god that has the most sprites on screen!'. it involves the art, music, story, cohesion, etc.
sorry but Horizon looks generic. the nature mixing with machines is a unique IDEA but how its been presented is nothing unusual when compared with other big triple A adventure game projects.
if either game has an arguement for being unique or different seeming it would be Zelda
