By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ZenfoldorVGI said:
starcraft said:
 

The first game was great, and it was 12-14 hours long. Microsoft said that this one is ten times larger. Assuming they are massively overestimating and saying it is five times larger, then assuming they mean literal space rather than game length, I think its safe to say that this game WILL be 20 hours long at least. For a game like Fable, I reckon that'd be great.

But I reckon it will massively impress, so by all means wait for IGN

 

Everyone said the same thing about the first game, you realize. It was supposed to be an endless world with 100 hours of gameplay, Diablo 2 esque, and genre defining.

It was a decent action RPG with a decent story and great production values. 10-12ish hours if you didn't take your time to complete everything.

Everything was the exact same as it is with part 2, right now. You should be wary that this game might pull a Fable.

What I consider different about this title is the fact that the hype is coming from the gaming press that have PLAYED the features being talked about, rather than Molyneux alone. 

In fact, a European site that played the game came out and said it was 20 times larger than Fable before Microsoft said it was 10 times as large.  I didn't pay attention to the gaming media in the lead-up to Fable, so I was unaware of the hype.  When I played it, I had no expectations, and found the best RPG I'd ever played (Its since become the second best after Mass Effect). 

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS