By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ZenfoldorVGI said:
starcraft said:
sinha said:
starcraft said:

Apparently if you wish, you can turn the breadcrumb trail off, or choose not to follow it.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2008/05/20/dlfable120.xml

Excellent.

The same source says that the overwhelming focus of Fable 2 is providing choice and story development, in addition to supporting the qualities of the first game.

 


Choice is story development usually means a 10 hours game with a shallow story that your meant to play through more than once, or a linear story where your choices all lead to the same end.

Either way, content that I can't see on one playthrough is content that should have been added to the overall length of the game.

I hate that crap.

Again, I'm betting this game is around 10 hours, 20 max, and it will be as dissapointing as the first game, which was great, just not the epic that we were all expecting.

No one was more excited about it than I was. Am I supposed to have my heart broken again? Nope, I'm staying cynical until this game is reviewed by IGN or Gamespot.

The first game was great, and it was 12-14 hours long.  Microsoft said that this one is ten times larger.  Assuming they are massively overestimating and saying it is five times larger, then assuming they mean literal space rather than game length, I think its safe to say that this game WILL be 20 hours long at least.  For a game like Fable, I reckon that'd be great.

But I reckon it will massively impress, so by all means wait for IGN 

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS