@ sqrl )
your temperature graph is flawed to the point of being useless ...
there is no y-axis marking and each step has 2000 years, so it's logical to think that the curve is an average of several years, instead of being one years data (it would fluctuate much more if it wasn't an average), so the last points on that curve could easily be an average of 50 to 100 years (it doesn't tell us, which is another point why the graph is useless), but global warming hasn't really set in until the 1970's to 1980's due to global dimming
so we can assume, that we can't see anything about the actual situation in that graph and can't use actual data to see where it is in that graph, because the y-axis doesn't have data .. highly doubious
btw - the comentation in the graph is highly flawed aswell, because glacial periods always followed a warm peak in the interglacial and never after a downslope in temperatures of the interglacial
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
