Nuvendil said:
You missed my point: copyright protects copying of distinguishable parts, not just the whole. You can't just copy characters' designs yourself and use that fact that you are modeling it yourself to dodge a copyright infringement case. If you copy, to be more on point, a chapter from a novel wholesale and put it in your own work, it would get you in trouble. If you copy Tracer exactlyor close to exactly, it doesn't matter if you did it yourself. Her design, manner of speech, mannerisms, all these aspects are part of the intelectual property and protected. now if you changed her design significantly you could get away with it but then again, that's not what we are dealing with here. We are dealing with porn intentionally resembling the characters in question as much as humanly possible. That's the whole point. Therefore, it IS copyright infringement. Tracer's design is also trademarked most likely. And this would be a disparaging of the mark, also a form of intelectual property infringement. Also, use for profit is not a prerequisit to copyright infringement. If it were, any absolute jerk with time on his hands could torpedo any author's career by shamelessly giving away his book for free en masse digitally and physically. It can be a mitigating factor in a strong Fair Use case but it does not absolve one of infringement.
Again, watch the video. It is far, far more informative than I can be and deals with the sort of thing directly. |
Can pornography be defined as parody? There are porn equivalents of hundreds of major movie releases. I remember back years ago and working at Blockbuster and having to explain multiple times that this "Pirates" DVD was not the Johnny Depp movie.








