By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Famine said:
PS360ForTheWin said:

Its american, which makes it biased, its also media owned, which makes it biased, wikipedia is a website encyclopedi and is not biased. therefore Wikipedia is better than the new york times by a long way, and ive never seen anyone or heard anyone in my country talk about or reading the new york times.


You're European, so your outlook is biased...sad but true, it clearly is from your post!

If you've never read the paper, and judging by your writing, that alone would make it an impossibility, don't make claims that are by far ridiculous.


i do infact read newspapers, generally i read the independent, but occasionly i have read other papers here, and also i type quickly on the web, when working/studying i type slowly, so of course my writing is not as good here, the same could be said for half the site. And i use wikipedia as a source as its reliable and not biased, not a paper, as papers are biased. Wikipedia is international not european.