Dad defends son(convicted rapist); "it was only 20 minutes of action"

[DoctorHorrible]

curl-6 said:

Derek89 said:

I was speaking in general and referring mostly about the father's comment (since that's what the topic is really about), but thanks for proving my point of people worried about virtue signaling not considering context.

That dude who raped thar girl is not just a rapist, he's a son, he's someone's little boy in his father's memory, he's loved by his father (all presumably) and has someone that is worried about his future. God forbit his father takes his son's side. No, the son is just a rapist, that's all he ever was and all he will ever be. Throw him outer space, pls. Now give me a pat in the back for how righteous I am, pls.

The fact that you're actually defending a convicted rapist is a little disturbing. And yes, that is what you're doing.

Not only are you miss characterizing him, but even if he were doing that.... There are people's profession who's sole purpose is exactly that. They are a necessity in our system too