fatslob-:O said:
1. You hit rock bottom with Clinton either way ... 2 & 3. Both Clinton and Sanders are far away from being the best for office ... 4. People complain about Trump for starting trade wars but they don't point that out for Sanders or his unrealistic spending program that'll bankrupt everyone ... 5. How so ? The establishment hates him and he self funds his campaign compared to Clinton feeding off from the hands of her masters LOL ... 6. It's funny how you avert your eyes from the fact that the debt ceiling raised more often under the Democratic Party's watch in congress ... 7. Who cares about best strategic choice against Trump when the #NeverTrump camp is voiding their own integrity in the end ... Trump existing is not an excuse for them to not match their beliefs by picking Clinton when she's very far away from them idelogically speaking compared to Gary Johnson ... |
1. Not when Trump is in the race.
2&3. And both are way better than Trump.
4. Going by his proposals, Trump would be even worse.
5. Trump is one of the "masters" who feeds politicians---by his own admission. Cutting out the middleman would remove the only potential buffer between corporate interests and public interests. Again, Hillary is the better choice by the measuring sticks you're providing.
6. It's funny how you avert your eyes to how much worse things would be under Trump.
7. Those who actually care about America. Trump is the worst choice in every category.
Trump existing is a perfect reason. A vote for Clinton is less a violation of one's integrity than a vote that doesn't impede Trump. You said you couldn't comprehend how a Bernie supporter could vouch for Clinton----Trump is the reason. He's the worst candidate to ever run in an American election. You can list every one of Hillary's flaws, detail every bad decision she could make in office and she's still the obvious choice when the alternative is Trump.