wartaal said:
OMFG you actually did the math(incorrect), and came up with 2,5% and you posted this. Then you realized it was actually 0,25% and you removed it. You basicly know you are wrong but you rather just keep on going. You are so unbelievably dishonest its just insane. And you are using 2012 which conviently has the highest amount of rapes/sexual assault in the last god knows how many years. Do you actually believe 20% of all women are raped(you initially said 25% btw)? Out of every year you knowingly picked the highest year and used this to do your flawed math. You sir suck at math and are skewing your numbers. You rather lie than admit defeat. Great job 12 million?????????? Omg the us have only 60 million women? When did the other 100 million die? Are you actually that stupid or were you hoping i didnt notice it? And that 350K includes sexual assualt, which is not rape, WHICH YOU KNOW!!!!!! And you dont multiply with percentages and add them you stupid idiot. 350K . 30 = 10.5 million women. THAT INCLUDES sexual assault. AFter 30 years its ........ 6.5%........ And that is using your skewed numbers. It includes sexual assault AND you used data from the peak year in rapes/sexual assault. |
The math I was doing was flawed because the DOJ has separate reports for reported non-reported and estimated crimes. According to the DOJ, sexual abuse has been on a trend downward. So 2012 is not the highest. And in fact, misses a lot of demographics:
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fvsv9410.pdf
Read this report, scroll down to the bottom where it says, incidence by year
1995 had 550k and 1996 500k and was in 400k+ territory until 2001. I'm interested to see why a drop happened though, because things like that generally don't occur without some kind of categorizational change.
You realize 12m was just for the full rape right? The statistic for the 1-5 or 1-4 (or however you want to box in my point like 5% matters to the validity of the entire argument) was based on all sexual assault. This was the statistic that was noted from the CDC, not the DOJ. The sarcasm in your voice is pretty damn condescending to those people bro. You have a lot of contempt, huh? That 350k is from the DOJ which is one report, as I have explained to you once already. And the 12m is from the CDC, a different report, which I've explained already. I wasn't trying to be exact in a simple multiplication that you should've easily put together on your own. Clearly 350k doesn't go into 12m 30 times as 3/12+4/12 is much closer to 3.5. But yeah sure, 5 more years is such a big difference when the average lifespan post 12 years old is another ~70 years or so.
See, when you discuss with someone online about things, it's assumed that the other side is at least not going to harp on trivial details. The truth is the important thing. Not who is right. A discussion is a way of helping each other find out what the truth is.
The DOJ also file different reports for incarcerated rape, military, and children, so... maybe you should take a look at yourself in the mirror. I'll find you the numbers but the DOJ had something like 80k inmates, 60k kids, and 15k military every year, and also admits that universities have their own figures that aren't reported as well. These numbers are not included in either the 350k number, the reported number or the non reported number. This is IN ADDITION TO. Because like I said, studies use very distinct points, and this one happens to be female in society aged 12+.
I don't argue with people who can't step past their own insecurities and have to use insults to try and prove their point. As if anything you've said has been rooted in any fact other than a single right-wing truther youtuber.
Also, reported. Take some time off, come back with some sources, if you actually have any. Show me your math, and show me how it differs from the number. Please, I would LOVE to see you shut yourself down.
