Clinton has clinched nomination-Also, Clinton or Trump?

[Scisca]

Zappykins said:

Scisca said:

Why? From what point of view? From the point of view of Europe (by Europe I mean - all countries apart from Russia and Germany), he'd be by far the best president.

From any point of view other than an oligarchical billionaire of light skinned male land owners.

For a Human Rights Point of View:

http://bust.com/general/13923-5-reasons-why-ted-cruz-becoming-president-would-be-bad-for-women.html

From an Environmental Point of View:

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/05/ted-cruz-joins-gop-group-demanding-that-justice-dept-stop-probing-big-oils-climate-denial/

From a Political Point of View:

http://personalliberty.com/why-ted-cruz-shouldnt-be-president/

From a Freedom from Religious Point of View:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/morgan-guyton/the-theology-of-governmen_b_4020537.html

 

For Business and the Internet:

http://www.inc.com/jeremy-quittner/ted-cruz-announces-for-presidential-run-2016.html

 

 

So to recap: he is bad for human rights, politics, patriotism, the environment, business, freedom of information and the internet and one of the founding principals of the USA which is Freedom from Religion.

I would seriously check your new sources if they are telling you that Ted Cruz is a reasonable person.  Even Texans want to get rid of him.

 

I haven't read everything, but stuff I've read really doen't matter to me. But bear in mind - I'm European and I judge your candidates on what plans they have for Europe. And from what I've hear from Clinton, Trump and Cruz, only Cruz seems to understand what Europe needs right now to avoid tragedy.