HappySqurriel said:
I never implied that you were less intelligent than me ... But your entire argument has been to get people to look at your 'facts' and then ignore any argument against those same 'facts' You have become so attached to the Global Warming hypothesis that you can not consider alternatives or even provide an adequate defence for your point of view. One of the undisputed facts of the Global Warming hypothesis is that positive and negative feedbacks essentially cancel eachother out (which is how our planet stays at 'equilibrium' over a long enough timeframe) so you can project the temperature increases dependant on the increase caused by CO2 alone. The impact of CO2 on our temperature is based on a logarithmic scale which means that for every doubling of CO2 emissions you have a 1 degree increase in global temperature; at the same time you have alarmists saying that the world temperature will increase by 3 to 5 degrees over the next century which implies CO2 output at 8 to 32 times our current level. Realistically, do you think that we can increase fossil fuel useage to 8 times our current usage without drastically increasing the cost of said fossel fuels (to a level where it is far too expensive to continue to use them)? |
i have read your posts, and i feel that they do nothing to cahnge my opinion, is that good enough for you, or will you not stop untill my opinion changes, if this is so, can a mod please delete this thread as its NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN.
