theprof00 said:
Ok I'm convinced you're a troll. well played. I'm shocked I took such nonsense seriously for 8 posts. Just in case you're not though... DOJ reports cases that have been reported to police either by the victim or by someone else falling under the definition of sexual assault are sexual activities as forced sexual intercourse, forcible sodomy, child molestation, incest, fondling, and attempted rape. "2 in 3 (65%) rape or sexual assault victimizations were not reported to police from 2006 to 2010" Pretending like police phone calls are the extent to which all crime happens is beyond laughable. That's like saying there aren't illegal immigrants living in america outside the ones that are caught every year. I liked that one, I laughed pretty hard m8. The actual DOJ report says that 350k sexual assault or rape cases were reported BY THE VICTIM or SOMEONE ELSE in 2012, and admits that up to 70% of rape goes unreported. You also don't know what ego-centrism means. Probably time to read a book. Hint: It doesn't mean ego-centric. And I'm not being narcissistic, you're just projecting your insecurity on me, because you clearly know very little. Here is some more info for your "video": As you can see, "having sex while drunk" is not one of the options this lady is talking about. Here are the actual questions asked about "intoxicated sex" Very different from "had sex while you were drunk" And on the subject of coersion: Additionally, non-violent coersion, intoxicated, and otherwise are all separated values. http://postimg.org/image/btis91vsl/ They aren't lumped all together, as you were saying they were.
Just as a quick breakdown: The CDC report includes those same line items plus a bunch of others including drugged, unable to give consent, pressured, lied to, manipulated, and non-violent forcing over lifetime averages. The two reports do not conflict. The two reports report diffferent things. Since you seem keen to believe I'm being all high and mighty, here is a metaphor a "7-year old" would understand. |
OMFG you actually did the math(incorrect), and came up with 2,5% and you posted this. Then you realized it was actually 0,25% and you removed it. You basicly know you are wrong but you rather just keep on going. You are so unbelievably dishonest its just insane. And you are using 2012 which conviently has the highest amount of rapes/sexual assault in the last god knows how many years. Do you actually believe 20% of all women are raped(you initially said 25% btw)? Out of every year you knowingly picked the highest year and used this to do your flawed math. You sir suck at math and are skewing your numbers.
You rather lie than admit defeat. Great job
12 million?????????? Omg the us have only 60 million women? When did the other 100 million die? Are you actually that stupid or were you hoping i didnt notice it? And that 350K includes sexual assualt, which is not rape, WHICH YOU KNOW!!!!!! And you dont multiply with percentages and add them you stupid idiot. 350K . 30 = 10.5 million women. THAT INCLUDES sexual assault. AFter 30 years its ........ 6.5%........ And that is using your skewed numbers. It includes sexual assault AND you used data from the peak year in rapes/sexual assault.
User was moderated for this post ~ CGI







