pearljammer said:
Okay, I'm quite sure I'd gleaned what you'd meant the first time. No one has the right to have sex with someone. I'm not thinking that one right is greater than the other, I'm saying that one is simply not a right at all. It's both oddly specific and bordering ownership. Since when have rights reached into other peoples' personhood (I suppose one could bring up abortion here, but I think there's an obvious disconnect). " I'm just saying that you either are together to have both happy and satisfied or you should be separated" - People are regularly far more complicated than this. Relations aren't binary. If my wife doesn't wish to have sex tonight, I absolutely have no right to her body regardless of our relationship status.
I thought that was perhaps what he'd meant. He doubled done on the whole 'right' thing though. |
This is why I'm guessing his thinking is very ethnocentric. He has a sound mind, good logic, and understands what a healthy relationship is (for the most part). However, like you and I both agree, relationships and people in general, are way more complicated. I am a natural empathizer, so I'm good at seeing things from other people's viewpoints and emotion. But not in the part that I am a 'sympathizer'. I am very good at reading and feeling what other people are feeling. I have found that in life, a majority of people have WAY MORE problems (caps for emphasis) than most other people will ever know. And people sometimes defy all logic.









