PS360ForTheWin said:
Sqrl said:
No your comment was perfectly in context. If you intended to point out those scientists then you could have done so directly. For instance: Scientists like Climatologies Kerry Emanuel of MIT who previously had previously said GW would be the cause of horrible natural disasters based on his climate models and recently rescinded that position?
But you chose to site groups that are by their nature bound to political agendas and ideas and whom are rife with reasons to only site those who agree with them. You brought that unneccessary layer into the discussion, what was the point if not to site them? Wikipedia, is a great source of information and you can make it sound like I disagree with everything there if you like but the simple fact is that much of what is there is correct and only a handful of it are things I've found reason to disagree with. Are you planning to site specifics as I have done? Truly this debate is one-sided at the moment, you've asked me and others in several posts to take the words of the unspecified scientists and unspecified polticians, etc.. and I've responded with specifics. If you have nothing to site then state so and move on. |
Wikipedia is specific, and if you agree with the article, then why do you say global warming is a myth, you have just contradicted yourself. |
Please site for me where I said global warming is a myth. Are you unable to read what I've written? Start from the top and read what I've said rather than skipping lines and assuming you know what I'm going to say. You have completely failed to comprehend a single thing I've said as evidenced by this completely ignorant comment.
Additionally you've just claimed that by citing an encyclopedia you were being specific....I honestly don't know how to respond to that...it is a fairly insane position to take.
