By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
PS360ForTheWin on 20 May 2008
Edit Thread
Sqrl said:
PS360ForTheWin said:
Sqrl said:
PS360ForTheWin said:
luinil said:

So you think that the same people and community that was wrong then CANNOT POSSIBLY be wrong today? PHUEY!! Open your eyes and question what you think you know. You will learn many things this way.


I just dont think there wrong this time, the evidence is overwhleming, the chances of them being wrong are very small, also given that fuel shortage is a FACT, do you not agree with me that alternate fuel sources are needed.


First, you asked if I thought every scientist who agrees with GW is wrong. My response would be to ask if you think the 32,000 scientists HappySquirrel's article talked about are wrong? Keep in mind over 9,000 of them have PhDs.

As for overwhelming evidence, please share with us some of the evidence since I quite frankly haven't seen anything convincing.

Please note, overwhelming refers to the vast number of reports on the internet and television that show it abd the fact that most politicians and scientists know aknowledge the problem. if u want to know more, go to wikipedia or google and search for global warming, i dont have time to give you all the millions of links.

Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming


See thats the point, I've done the research, I've read everything ranging from people who completely support it to people who completely disagree with it and the conclusion I keep finding is that there isn't enough evidence for AGW but in fact that the evidence shows just the opposite. I've read the wikipedia page on GW a number of times, as well as pretty much all of the off-shoot links to related topics as well as places like RealClimate.com, and too many more to recount. So if you know of evidence then please site it. I've done the reading and I'm ready to debate the topic regardless of who it is on the other end, because not only am I confident in my position, I'm simply not afraid to be proven wrong...the truth is the goal afterall.

As for the TV and politicians...that comment is laughable, those people are not scientistis, they are actually the PERFECT example of the types of people you would expect to hold science as a hostage for their own causes...they do it with everything else so why not science?

 


thank you for taking my comments out of context, by tv/internet reports i mean that feature scientists and there reports, i would have thought that was obvious. So wikipedia and all its links are insufficient and you call me stubborn.