Azzanation said:
I am more interested in knowing what those 4 genres Naughty Dog nailed? I can think of Crash being one of them, which is fair enough, they were fun platformers, but what are the other 3? Kart racing went from Great with CTR to below average with Jak X. There next platformer series Jak and Daxter are far from top of the table games. I would consider them good games but there nothing above that, let’s be totally honest here. There’s a reason they stopped making them. Naughty Dog are great at making linear action experiences like Uncharted and they did make great platformers with Crash for the PS1, however years later there next attempts at platforming and kart racing fell below par. Which is why you don’t see them jumping into those genres anymore. Rockstar are the same, they can produce GOTY games like Red Dead and GTA however that’s the only genre they work on. I am saying what a company can do now, not what they did make 2 to 3 generations ago. I use to consider Rare the best in the industry in the 90s but its quite clearly that Rare of today is far from that mark, much like ND are with Crash. If we go by what you mentioned with ND and there genres they covered years ago then Rare would still hold that crown today by a big margin. As for Blizzard losing their energy compared to the 90s? Not sure how they lost energy when today they have a lot more on their plate and become so much more as a company then what they ever dreamed of becoming. |
Of course you'd be interested in hearing about that. I saw it coming a mile away.
But I'm not here to debate the merits of Naughty Dog's games with someone like you.
Just focus on the part that I agreed with you about Blizzard, and let's leave it at that. I am not interested in reading what you have to say about Sony's first party developers.