When is murder justified by self-defense?

[archer9234]

Teeqoz said:

archer9234 said:

Comic books is a generic example. Their are examples of real life bullshit. You would of saved peoples lives. And who says I need to kill? I'd actually hurt people in the legs or arms, to disable them. But even that would be still considered "wrong". If say I blew their leg off, by mistake. Or somehow paralized them. Like if I shoved a person down the stairs.

What If I killed someone, because the burglar had a blood clot in the brain? Or if, I just punched a person too hard? I'm supose to be a robot, and know the maxmium PSI to disable a person, right? The fuck do I need a bullet to the head? I know not to Burglar or do stupid shit. These people in question don't care. Do it still. If someone is actually threatens a life. Then you are going to have to stop them. But the choice is not gonna be known if it's right or wrong.

If your intention is to do what it takes to defend yourself, but you accidentally kill them, then that is not what this thread is adressing (at least not from what I can tell). Killing someone by accident in self-defense is completely different from killing someone purposely.

That's what I saw from this thread. Who here said they're killing the person on purpose? No one. They're defending the family as they see fit. Unless the person was using the burglars head as a basketball. The burglar gave up, and they still killed the burglar. Or this was a setup. It should automatically be self defense. And these people should be banned from suing the family they burglared. That's a crock of shit.