aLkaLiNE said:
This goes under the premise that people can't change though... Your view is pessimistic which, I understand because I disdain society as a whole but that doesn't mean we can't change. We are all to varying degrees products of society. I think that there are other social structures we should examine before deciding that a violent individual needs to die. Or, for instance, what if someone made a regrettably violent act out of love? Such as a love triangle? That doesn't necessarily define who they are entirely as a person. It is but one aspect. Or what about someone that actively hates humanity but loves this planet and it's creatures? I'm not going to pretend to know your story Vivster, as we all come from different walks of life. But meeting violence with violence will only perpetuate more violence. If that weren't so then the world wouldn't forever be at war with itself. And that's why and where things need to change. |
If a Burglar or whatever, does the same type crime, after awhile. They lose redemption. It's the same reason why people get mad at villians in comics. Batman would be over, if he stopped giving chances. After a certain point.
Teeqoz said:
In that case... what the fuck. KK m8 death penalty for stealing a 50 cent chocolate bar seems pretty fair... Or do you think that's too extreme? Hard to tell what *is* too extreme for you when your opinions are that extreme. |
If the person has a gun or knife. Then that person is a fucking fool. To risk their life, over a candy bar, to begin with. If they don't. Then kick their ass, and send them to basic jail.







