setsunatenshi said:
i'm not following, what do you mean by the only way to get from 30 to 60 fps is by having a twice as powerful CPU? so let's say (to simplify the argument) that I'm playing battlefield 4 on PC with processor X and a GTX 670 getting about 60 fps on average in high quality. if i want to double the fps count to 120 i should: a) get processor Y with double the frequency of processor X, but keep the same gfx card b) get a gtx 970 and keep the same processor X Which one of these scenarios do you think will double your FPS? edit: just to help out, here's a reference benchmark for the same gfx card testing the fps output with different CPUs |
He is talking about putting a double capacity processing CPU, not necessarily doube frequency.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







