| Veknoid_Outcast said: I'm surprised how lopsided the poll results are! I figured at least someone would go for quantity over quality. Having 4x as many games is surely an attractive proposition? |
in general i'd say i'd take quanity over "quality". for 2 reasons:
1. i like to play a lot of games not 1 game a lot.
2. i like genres that are typically not reviewed well like puzzle and platformer.
so my problem with your poll is that top 20 is still 20 games (according to your rules) which is a lot of games. in the meta critic distribution of games that is basically every game rated above an 80.
if we are going by review scores i'd say the "interesting" breakdown is 90 - 100 meta, 80 to 90 meta; and 70 and below meta.
90+ are great games but very few.
80 - 90 are good games and quite a few
70 and below is a ton of games and quite a few misunderstood "gems".
in that poll i'd go with 80-90 on the quantity over "quality" argument for sure. as amazing as some of those 90+ games are i just couldn't deal with only a couple games a year.
