By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Puppyroach said:
ohmylanta1003 said:

No. What I'm saying is that most people don't want or need a singleplayer campaign and would much rather invest money into a well built multiplayer game. Thinking that a game can only be full price if it has singleplayer is a little naive, childish, and narrow minded, don't you think?

First of all, the game is 60$ on X1 so it´s priced the same amount as every other AAA game. And if you look at a game that has MP+SP for 60$ where the MP has as much content as Overwatch (and it doesn´t seem to have much MP content either) why is it motivated to charge 60$ for the MP only game? I am not saying it has to have a SP campaign in order to be full-priced, what I am saying is that we need to stop paying these sums of money for games with low content because it further pushes the industry towards a pay-to-play model in the future.

How about you realize that not every game needs to have a single player campaign. Just because you like it doesn't mean that every game NEEDS it in order to be good.

also, pay to play?! Last I checked, people didn't need cosmetic skins to play. Clearly you don't have the game but are keen to judge it and it's "future message"