| aLkaLiNE said: I thought the whole point of GPGPU compute was allowing the GPU to offload some of the workload from the CPU for labor intensive tasks. I did research on this quite a few months back and to my understanding, GPGPU compute is not generally practiced in game development but rather in things like video editing and so on. If that's the case, and since we know that the first Ps4 is heavily unified, wouldn't it stand to reason that the GPU could help with framerates for games that utilized such a feature? (Most definitely it would just be in exclusives, but the first party titles Sony has put out have very consistent framerates. Even BloodBorne which comes from a series that is known for its performance issues) |
It's similar to what you do in a regular desktop with CUDA. However, GPUs are heavily parallelized, while CPUs are more single-threade oriented. So what you can offload varies. If you are talking about computations full of conditions and different paths (AI), it's a pure CPU task. But some tasks are easily paralelized, like some types of physics. So you run them on the GPU.
Also mind that GPGPU on PC is very different, because you don't have an unified memory. So if you are dealing with data on your CPU (system RAM) and wants to pass some task to the GPU, you have to copy it to the GPU's VRAM. That's very slow. An unified memory allows you to offload tasks that wouldn't be interesting on a shared memory architecture.
So you are correct. A routine like physics that runs on the GPU would be faster on the Neo, so it would depend if the CPU tasks of the game can be parallel or not.
