By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
gatito on 02 June 2016
Edit Thread
Aeolus451 said:
Soundwave said:

Except there are many species of animals where females are the "alphas" quote, unquote and several species where that changes. Some species of animals even change sex. 

And homosexuality is rampant in nature with other species. In nature some species of female also bite off the head of the male and eat it during sex, lol. 

If we go by nature, a lot of religious conservatives would wind up with a stick right up their ass. If you study nature and role of sex and gender is incredibly diverse, even frightening probably to human sensibilities. 

I disagree with your examples but not your point. Humans are just one species and humans evolved a certain way where each sex fits it's certain role that's suited to them. Of course, people do what they want but that doesn't change what nature intended.  

Evolution? Women give birth, that is a biological fact and cannot be changed (yet). But how are they more fit to raise, nurture and protect a child? Short answer: they're not. That's because a man can do it just fine (except for breast milk but most people nowadays don't even like that).

If the mother dies at childbirth is the baby screwed? Oh no, you lost the one person that was naturally intended to make sure you get your diapers changed, take you to school and other womanly stuff, we might as well dump you right now because it's the natural way. Daddy can't do it, that's for sure. He's a man and is not prepared fot this kind of stuff.

So yeah, no evolution here. Man and women are not that different aside from genitals. That's from a physical standpoint. Gender on the other hand is what makes all the difference.