Overwatch is much, much too expensive.

[midrange]

Puppyroach said:

Chazore said:

Because as far as things go with the way the game is currently selling, that it's a price the people are fine with. If you think your standard should be the average standard then what of mine?. You are hoping a game fails because you don't agree with the PP, that is the part I'm on about.

Which is what the market is about. If people feel that it is ok to pay 60$ för the game (which is the price on X1 atleast) then that is the standard that you are for. If the game would sell badly, people would most likely feel that it should have been priced lower, which is the standard I am for. Me hoping it will sell badly does not mean that your opinion is worse or better, just different, and the market decides what the result will be for the game.

What we can be sure of, is that if these games with lesser content than other 60$ games sell very well, developers will continue to reduced content for full-priced games, so your willingness to fund this practice contribute to the rest of us consumers getting less value for more cash in the future.

What other way do you think there is to affect these developers to change their practices, other than through our wallets?

You are insinuating that by selling well, overwatch encourages low content. But this only holds if overwatch has low content. In your OPINION it does have low content. In the opinions of others, there is significant content available.

therefore, the only message that overwatch sends by selling a lot is that people like overwatch