Pemalite said:
Let's not forget the Geforce 1080. AMD reclaiming performance/watt isn't happening with Polaris. |
The RX 480 is an "up to" 150W card, at least the 4GB card, with most leaks suggesting that it would use something more like 120-130W.
But that's not that important, is it? What's really important is that Polaris is a huge improvement over previous GCN chips, and that now even the reference cooler might be a valid option.
Pemalite said:
Eh. 40% more than what though? Excavator? Piledriver? Stars? Still not enough to match Intel unfortunately, might be sufficient to regain some Mainstream marketshare though. |
It's 40% more than Bulldozer.
By the way, the clock speed of the RX 480 has been confirmed at 1,266 MHz by a screenshot captured by TechPowerUp
http://www.techpowerup.com/223043/amd-radeon-rx-480-clock-speeds-revealed-clocked-above-1-2-ghz
Also, for a thread about Polais, I find the lack of pictures of the card a bit disappointing.
http://www.techpowerup.com/223044/feast-your-eyes-on-these-official-amd-radeon-rx-480-renders
Notice how the reference board seems to be rather small. I'd say that some third party cards will come close to the size of the R9 Nano.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.