twesterm said:
See, I can understand your second point if the searches caused you any actual disconvenience but it (theoretically) should be completely transparent. Would you rather not have your phone tapped or have a terrorist attack here hundred of people killed stopped? Would you rather have your emails secret or stop a child molester from gaining another victim? |
Obviously it is best to prevent crimes, but it should not be at the expense of the rights of the innocent. That is what your founding fathers envisioned, and while I do not believe a constitution should not be adapted with time, it should be adapted to give people more liberties, not take them away.
I would not say it to the victims of the scenarios you mentionned, but yes I do perfer the certainty of enjoying liberties rather than the possibility that giving away my rights will prevent an event which may or may not have happened either way. And if I really had to say it to their faces, I would.
They can get away with this in the U.K. because people are still subjects to the monarchy.







