Dogs Rule said:
The right to privacy is considered to be a civil liberty in many jurisdictions. It is in Canada. @ yellow comment: That is not the way your constitution is set up, nor is Canada's Charter of rights and freedoms. Civil liberties, such as the right against unreasonable search and seizure,were not conceived as technicalities to get the guilty acquitted. They are there to protect people who have "nothing to hide" from being searched for no reason, even if it means some evidence will have to be excluded in the trial of a guilty person. |
See, I can understand your second point if the searches caused you any actual disconvenience but it (theoretically) should be completely transparent.
Would you rather not have your phone tapped or have a terrorist attack where hundred of people killed stopped? Would you rather have your emails secret or stop a child molester from gaining another victim?








